Democrats are responsible for Iraq.

Did I get your attention?
Don't really believe it?
Ok follow me. This is a 10 year trip through history.
1993 The first attack on the World Trade Center Occurs.
Bill Clinton and the Democrats including smiling Mike from Louisville decide that instead of increasing the budget to catch the people who planned this they will cut the budget for intelligence by 10 Billion Dollars. Just months before Ossama Bin Laden has been identified as one of the most dangerous people on the planet. He has declared Jihad and has access to millions of dollars of his families assets.
For 7 years the country cuts the budget and allows Ossama Bin Laden to increase his command of Al Queda which attacks us in Kenya, and in Oman. No real retaliation is ever attempted on Ossama Bin Laden. He is involved in what is known as the Black Hawk Down incident and when the Sudan Leaders attempt to turn him over to the United States, Bill Clinton out of fear of what would happen if the worlds worst terrorist were to be brought to US soil turns him down.
At this point our intelligence on Ossama, Sadam and other terrorists is dependent on people inside who have agenda's not on assets we have developed.
Additionally we are fighting an extended undeclared war on Sadam and Iraq. Clinton fails to act on any of the dozens of UN Warnings and opts to bomb Iraq whenever he has a problem. He abuses the military to the point that ammunition for training and for Air Flight Programs to train pilots are beneath those required to keep the troops at peak readiness at a time we are at our most vulnerable.
Now comes the 2000 election.
Gore loses in a wierd bit of election oddity. For only the second time in US History the winner loses and people do not take it well.
(Let me point out that in the Florida Recount that DEMOCRATS attempted to deny Thousands of votes by SOLDIERS overseas, abusing the very people we need to protect our country.) Yeah a cheap shot but one I feel justified in pointing out.
People HATE BUSH who did not vote for him.
Fast Forward to 9-11 only 8 months into the Bush Administration.
The intelligence community is beginning to reestablish itself, but has not fully recovered from the full effect of the Clinton assault on the Intelligence community.
Ossama makes good on his threat to attack the US and kill thousands.
We invade Afghanistan and due to previous cuts in intelligence we have to depend on War Lords and Drug Dealers to lead the assault instead of in place assets.
Fast forward to 2002, and Sadam Hussein is again thumbing his nose at the international community. Bush wants him out, and so do the Democrats. Everyone including John Kerry, and Mr. Kennedy want the man out of office. The world is fed up with his antics. Russia's Putin reports that Sadam is actively seeking ways to attack the United States. The intelligence community relying on Iraqi's in the country with an agenda to get rid of Sadam believe that Sadam still has WMD's. Gas, Biological and possibly Nuclear weapons at his disposal. The Congress and the Senate decide we must attack Sadam before he can assist Al Queda or another group to attack the United States.
In the mean time, he has been giving money to Hamas and to the families of Murder Bombers who attack Israeli's. $50,000 to each family. His fingerprints are beginning to appear on other terrorist activities. He is shielding terrorists who have killed Americans. He continues to turn on radar and tracking in the No Fly Zone in an attempt to target American Planes. He has refused to comply with UN Sanctions and Inspections. America BELIEVING that he will either attack or help others to attack us invades Iraq, with the help of England, Spain, Italy and many other countries.
NO WMD's are found.
Why? Lets go back to 1993 and that 10 BILLION DOLLAR cut in the intelligence budget.
The Bush administration did not have the assets in place because of those cuts.
Despite that there are a dozen other reasons to invade and stop him from fomenting more terror in the region.
Apparently the Democrats forget those reasons.
Now they want to Cut and Run from Iraq. Giving the terrorists a place to recruit and to train more terrorists. Growing up I was taught that you must finish what you start. WE started this both Democrats and Republicans. President Bush wants to do the right thing as does Ann Northup.
John Yarmuth wants to gut our national interests for fear of losing more men.
This is what Ossama Bin Laden WANTS and has predicted. Give in to this mentallity and the end of terror will be delayed for years, if not making them in the end successful.
Northup votes with George Bush 91% of the time? Ok what is your point. The only point is that she is supporting the President of the United States during a time of war.
This war on terror would end in 12 months if the Democrats would quit their bitching and get behind the effort. Ossama Bin Laden would not be able to recruit if the US was 90% Approving of the efforts to end terror.
Want proof? Look at Spain. When Spain was having elections there were attacks inside the country and SPAIN voted out their government and Spain left Iraq. The same has happened time and again when we have had elections. Al Queda and the elements in Iraq who want Anarchy are voting for you. They are attacking harder and harder NOW because they believe we will cut and run and they want us to CUT and RUN. When the election is over the terror will be less and less if the Democrats Take over and we talk of leaving. If the Republicans win, the violence will most likely continue but still at a lesser amount until the next opportunity to influence the election. Shame on the press for ignoring this fact.
Terrorists are influencing the vote in this fight.
Vote for Northup if you want the terror to end.
Vote for Yarmuth if you wan the terror to end, for a while, until it comes HERE to the US again.
Yarmuth has been against almost every effort since 9-11 to get intelligence and to hurt the terrorists. Read his LEO editorials.
Yarmuth is so Liberal that he scares even some Liberals.
Jim Dicken